Josh and his team proved their track record. I hired him at 9am and they appeared for me by 1pm the same day. Highly contested paternity case, turned dependency nightmare. He faught hard in a short time and got the results I needed. My baby back. Josh and his associates are kind, patient, diligent and aggressive. They are human. I trusted them through the whole process. I was kept informed and they faught with passion. I’d rehire josh and his team any day. It was well worth the money spent. – Rochelle
Keeping or Selling the Marital Home in a Florida Divorce: Questions Beyond the Appraisal
A marital home may be one of the largest assets in a Florida divorce, but its appraised value is only one part of the decision. When spouses are considering whether one person should keep the property or whether it should be sold, the practical consequences may matter just as much as the number assigned to the house.
Keeping a familiar home can feel like the most stable option, particularly when children are involved. Yet ownership after divorce can bring mortgage payments, insurance, maintenance, association fees, repairs, and other expenses that previously may have been supported by two incomes.
Questions worth examining include:
- Whether one spouse can realistically carry the property’s ongoing expenses
- How a proposed sale date could affect both spouses’ housing plans
- What happens if significant repairs are needed before a sale
- How responsibility for maintaining the property will be handled while it remains jointly owned
- Whether keeping the home fits the spouse’s broader post-divorce financial circumstances
These considerations can change the way a settlement proposal looks. A spouse may strongly prefer the home but later discover that maintaining it leaves too little flexibility for other expenses. Conversely, an immediate sale may create unnecessary disruption when another workable arrangement could have been considered.
If the property will remain jointly owned temporarily, details matter. The parties may need clear expectations about who lives there, who pays particular expenses, how repairs are approved, and when the property will ultimately be listed or transferred.
There can also be an emotional tendency to treat the home differently from other assets. That is understandable, but divorce negotiations generally benefit from evaluating both emotional priorities and practical consequences.
The appropriate solution depends on the family’s circumstances, financial resources, and the terms ultimately approved by the court. General information cannot determine whether retaining or selling a particular home is advisable.
When the marital residence is becoming a central settlement decision, Brodie & Friedman can help you examine the legal and practical questions that may affect the next chapter of home ownership.
Contact
561-392-5100
Mon – Fri, 9AM – 5PM
[email protected]
1675 N. Military Trail, Suite 730 Boca Raton, Florida 33486- Zoom consultations are available.